[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]

Re: Wasser engine


I used to know a guy, about 15 years ago who had put a 911 in a Fastback.
Because the Type 3 is about 500 lb lighter than a 911 at that time, it was
truly a remarkable car.  Would never fit in a SB.  too tall,  no pancake
setup that I know of available for the 911 engine.  However, a Corvair 140
hp, which is also a flat 6, will fit in a SB.  I know it will, cause I did
it back in the 70's.  Parts for corvairs were hard then, they would be
impossible now.

Fun stuff.

Jim Showker


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marc Weber" <arcady@well.com>
To: <type3@vwtype3.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 5:49 AM
Subject: Re: Wasser engine


> As I understand it the type IV and Wasserboxer cases are quite
> similar. I have a '78 type IV in my Squareback and the stock
> waterboxer in my '86 Syncro van. The waterboxer is however 112 HP
> from the factory instead of the 80 or 90 or so of the '78 type IV...
> wonder if there's enough real interchangeability to beef up a type IV
> with  some stock waterboxer parts, like for instance the fuel
> injection?
> On the engine swap front, has anybody seen a Porsche 911 motor in a
> Squareback? I saw a nice installation in a Ghia convertible at a
> show, wondered it if would fit in a Squareback (without raising the
> decklid).
> - Marc
> p.s. aesthetics aside, in my opinion the waterboxer and type IV are
> just too similar to justify the hassle of putting water cooling in an
> air-cooled car.
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
List info at http://www.vwtype3.org/list | mailto:gregm@vwtype3.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]