[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 23:02, Jim Adney wrote: > On 5 Feb 2005 at 22:53, Russ Wolfe wrote: > > > So, no shim can be correct, and 2 is max. > > Right, I understand that. It's just odd that all the engines you've seen had > one shim while all the engines I've seen had 2. > > OTOH, I'm getting old and my memory is not what it once was. But, then again, I > think you're even older than me! > I think that is why you and I keep all the manuals around. To refresh our memories. -- Russ Wolfe '71 FB AT '66 FB MT '64 T34 (not running) '65 T1 (not running) russw@classicvw.org http://www.classicvw.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ List info at http://www.vwtype3.org/list | mailto:gregm@vwtype3.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~