[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]
> I think we determined after the Invasion that the Square's I was running > with were getting better mileage, probably due to better areodynamics, rather > than speed. > I would expect the Fastback to have better aerodynamics than the Square simply from the shape, but then the Squareback is the only wagon I know that doesn't kick up dirt onto its back window, so i wouldn't be surprised to find it has unusual aerodynamics. The test was with an automatic; don't remember if yours was auto or manual, Bob. Of course, the figures were based on accurate speeds, rather than optimistic speedo with low-profile tyres. Even a half-worn tyre would give an error of around +1.5% in speed over a new tyre. Dave. UK VW Type 3 & 4 Club http://www.hallvw.clara.co.uk/ ------ ----- Original Message ----- From: <BOB2TYPE3S@aol.com> To: <type3@vwtype3.org> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 3:21 AM Subject: Re: [T3] Gas mileage experiments > In a message dated 8/28/05 6:48:05 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > dave@hallvw.clara.co.uk writes: > > << Yes, for a '69 1600TLE with 5,500 miles at a temp of 72F the report gave > the > following mileages:- > > mph > mpg (US galls) > 75 > 21.6 > 80 > 17.6 > > I guess we're all proud of our old cars and tend to drive them as fast as we > would a newer one. >> > > Well these numbers are close, but I was getting better than 17.6 coming back > from the 2004 Invasion. : ) But then the chart didn't go up high enough > either. :O > Bob 65 Notch S w/ Sunroof > 71 Square, Formerly a 2 seat Roadster, now a T-3 Heb, pics can be seen > at; > http://volksrods.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=2977 > 69 Square, currently awaiting a 2.0L t-4 engine transplant > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > List info at http://www.vwtype3.org/list | mailto:gregm@vwtype3.org > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > >