[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]

Re: [T3] Fuel Injection's NOT Fuel Infection...


Hello-

I am approximately as non-purist as it comes.  Modification is welcomed...
so long as it is an _improvement_.  There are two types of modifying:
improving (even in the broadest definition of good taste) and rigging.

At the Ypsilanti, MI, show, I met a gentleman with a 2-door 411 Fastback.
For those who don't know, these are EXTREMELY rare, ESPECIALLY in the US.
It was the best-looking of all the T4's, and was intended to recieve a 901
5-speed transmission and 6-cylinder engine as an option (a la 914-6, only a
411-6).  Porsche and VW decided to eliminate that option from the
drawingboard at the last minute.  There were ~100 that were imported here
via special programs (they were never on showroom floors), and that's it.
He had it restored pretty danged well.  He even had an original Type 4
4-speed manual transmission that still functioned as new.

And, he was proud of the Weber progressive carb conversion he did to replace
that "stock FI stuff."  D'oh!!!

Now, I would accept Webers on a "stock 411" engine if they happened to be a
pair of IDA3C's!  :-)

Seriously, want to modify the engine as an improvement?  How about doing
what Porsche intended?  No joke - there were 411-6's running around the test
tracks circa 1965-68.  Prototypes existed.  Ever see a T4 manual tranny?
Look at the nosecone location... then look at a 901 5-speed... coincidence?
Ever see how huge and open a T4 Fastback engine bay is (there's no trunk
like a T3 Fastback)... coincidence?  The problem is that the 411 was
overbudget and overweight, and the little 2.0 901 engine had to wind up too
high to be effective.  While that's fine for a sports car, it was bothersome
in this "family/luxury" car.

Take care,
Shad Laws
LN Engineering - Aircooled Precision Performance
http://www.lnengineering.com

> Let me tell you about a friend of mine...
> (this is your cue, Jim, Keith, et. al to do some breathing exercises, fix
a drink, or whatever you do to relax ;-)
> My friend is very stubborn. He is also a highly opinionated VW purist. He
rags on me for having a '68 3 band Blau & a chrome
> stock shifter (dropped in '70) in my '71. He hates anything custom almost
as much as a H2O cooled car...you know the type.
> Anyway...he has a '69 Fasty automatic, which HAD FI. Thing is, it sat for
years & he added a Pertronix w/o really trying to get it running...Then the
dreaded "FI" problems started (yea, right). I volunteered my help, but my
PITA friend was never available when I could help him. He came up with his
own solution that there was NO talking him out of: convert to a single
sidedraft carb from a 1500N motor that's been outside for years, using a
modified dual port manifold from a T1 & a Bugpack electric fuel pump. Guess
what? It runs, but awful & I refuse to help. I tried to explain to him what
a bad mistake he was making, but to no avail. He thinks with some "tweeks"
he will have a super reliable year round driver. I tell him time & again, I
had a super reliable year round driver in a '72 Square...with STOCK FI! I am
preaching to the choir here, I know...
> I will be at the next Invasion in Hershey, no problem...will there be a
single carbed auto '69 Fasty behind me? I doubt it.
>
> Later,
> Eric H.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> List info at http://www.vwtype3.org/list | mailto:gregm@vwtype3.org
>
>
>


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]