[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]

Re: [T3] Heated debate in the office.....


> Otherwise there certainly was the VW type 411 fastback with the
> type 4 pancake (which is rotary, just not Wankel) engine.
>

I think this just confuses the issue Jim.
I appreciate there is a rotary engine in the aircraft sense that has
separate cylinders and pistons, with a rather complex arrangement of
crankshaft, but I don't think a 411 flat four really counts as a rotary
engine any more than a Type 3 engine does.

In car applications, I would consider a rotary engine to be a Wankel engine,
ie there are no separate cylinders, but combustion chambers are shaped in a
ring of metal and a co-axial lobed rotor spins within that ring.  One of the
major benefits is the lack of heavy reciprocating parts, allowing greater
smoothness and higher rpm.
But you know all this anyway.

Dave.
UK VW Type 3 & 4 Club
http://www.hallvw.clara.co.uk/
------

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Too much? Digest! mailto:type3-d-request@vwtype3.org Subj=subscribe


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]