[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]
On 2 Jul 2001, at 16:43, Jim Adney wrote: > The M-code listing from the microfilm lists M240 as the low > compression modification. VW was known to have recycled M- > codes in later years, so it is possible that M240 was a typo and > should have been M249 in the early years. I double-checked my printed version of the parts list, and it, too, shows M240 as the low compression option. That also shows up in the engine charts, so it really doesn't look like a typo. Is it possible that your tag actually says M240? - ******************************* Jim Adney, jadney@vwtype3.org Madison, Wisconsin, USA ******************************* ------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe? mailto:type3-request@vwtype3.org, Subject: unsubscribe