[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]

RE: [T3] For whom the bell tolls...


Okay, I just wrote Jim a nice big thank-you for being such a mensch, and
here I go with the bat.

	-----Original Message-----
	From:	Jim Adney [SMTP:jadney@vwtype3.org]
	Sent:	Wednesday, January 13, 1999 10:04 PM
	To:	type3@vwtype3.org
	Subject:	Re: [T3] For whom the bell tolls...

	I have heard this argument frequently over the internet, but usually

	it takes the form of "Well, I have a 59 Chevy that doesn't smoke a 
	bit, so I KNOW that it is justoÂœ³n as any new car."

	Actually, that argument is not accurate.  On the other hand, I had a
1964 Mercury Park Lane Fastback (gawd!  The lines on that car!), that *every
single year* got between 285 and 447 parts per million of hc emissions.
That *easily* passes the 1974 emissions standards in AZ (I'd like to see a
1989 car pass the standards for a 99), and the 285ppm would probably bring
you to the brink of the 1981 revision.  That *is* 18 years ago, and new cars
*do* put out less than that (the x's Jetta was getting like 101ppm).
Understand though, that this was for all intents and purposes a stock motor,
that was only getting regular maintenance (and getting beat on by a 21-year
old at every stop light), so it was an average car.

	Steve is right, if your engine is running correctly, and tuned to
specification, there is no reason why (especially the FI jobs) can't be
running very clean, if not to the standard of the 'brand new' cars.  - Which
is a fairly decent misnomer, as with the *hundreds* of pounds of plastic on
every new car that will *never* go away, along with all the wasted resources
from not recycling properly, and throwing away the car when it's only a few
years old...  The list goes on, and I'm losing my thread.

	The issue is a ridiculous one; an automaker is dumping hundreds of
gallons of toluene into the environment every month, and to get enviro
spiffs from the EPA, they make a small group of kooks that drive old
air-cooled VW's give up their cars, so the automaker can spend less on
fines, *and keep dumping hundreds of gallons of toluene into the environment
every month!!!*  This *is* the bottom line.

	How many (let's just be ridiculous, and add in all the rest)
air-cooled VW's are registered in America?  Balance that against the rest of
the 'new' cars.  Then balance that against the tens of thousands of aluminum
cans you see lying on the sides of the road *every f'ing day!*  Then,
balance *that* against every city bus or 18 wheeler, belching huge, black
clouds of benzoapyrenes into the alvºeathe.  Or the huge black clouds
dumping out of the back of every jet in *every* airport of *every* city.

	If you want to talk about pollution, we could go into spent nuclear
fuel rods, that lie in decaying concrete bunkers in remote places in the
south west.  *That's* what I don't want my (future) children to have to deal
with.  A fraction of the population that's driving old cars that are *better
maintained* than *any* new car, doesn't concern me. - That's another thing.
Do your neighbours (who don't drive VW's) take as close care of their
vehicles as you do?  Probably only if they drive old cars (by choice).
People who drive these old cars do it because we *like* them, so we take
better care of them.

	I'm going to stop now, and go sit by a tree and meditate.  My blood
pressure's a little up.  I think I need a cup of tea.

	My apologies to the list.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe? mailto:type3-request@vwtype3.org, Subject: unsubscribe


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]