[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]
True, true. Just echoing what I read in the Berg catalog. Or (knowing my
memory) that's what he said and I flopped it. Anyway, a volumetric drop
still would not be good, correct?
Toby Erkson, air_cooled_nut@pobox.com
'72 VW Squareback 1.6L bored and stroked to 2.0L
'75 Porsche 914 1.8L
Portland, Oregon, http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/8501/
P.S. Please volks, there's no need to copy me if you're going to be sending
your comment to the Type III mailing list as well. I understand what you were
saying the first time! :)
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Re[4]: New engine coming
Author: type-3-errors@umich.edu at SMTPGATE
Date: 10/8/97 7:31 PM
>
>Now, part of his philosophy dictates that an external oil cooler
shouldn't
>be needed on an engine and one of the reasons, though minor, is that
many
>oil coolers are a restriction and they are what cause the drop in oil
>pressure.
Actually resistrictions to flow increase pressure, thet decrease volume.
Try putting a type4 cooler on a type one, there is a 45 degree change,
but a pressure drop of 30 lbs at high rpms. This can be solved with a
pressure adjuster put in the oil control hole.
Jasper-Flat Four Racing
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com