[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [T3] brake bleeding question
On 24 Aug 2005 at 9:25, Everett Barnes wrote:
> > Okay, this is getting more complicated and more interesting. Would you be
> > able
> > to go to one of these early cars and measure the horizontal distance
> > between
> > the back of the pedal and the metal crosspiece in front of it? I wonder if
> > it
> > is closer than the 220/225mm specified for the later cars.
> >
> Unfortunately this is too difficult on my current '63 Squareback due to the
> rubber mats (instead of carpet).
How about just measuring to the mat and then estimating the thickness of the
mat?
> > Any chance that the early pedals just got set more "upright" than the
> > tandem MC pedals?
> >
> I have noticed a difference. Driving my '67 Squareback, I couldn't wear my
> hiking boots because my shoe couldn't get in between the brake pedal and
> tunnel to push the accelerator. Size 10 shoe. Even my normal tennis shoes
> barely fit. I've noticed other people asking about this in the past.
>
> My '63 has tons of room.
Yes, getting big boots in there is a learned skill. ;-)
The book shows just one brake pedal for '65-'69, and I don't know what changed
in '69. They also show a different pushrod starting in '67, to be used with a
different MC boot, which I don't recall ever seeing.
There is a gap in the brake pedals between the very early cars and '65. I can't
tell what happened there.
It looks like there were a lot of changes being made for not very obvious
reasons.
--
*******************************
Jim Adney, jadney@vwtype3.org
Madison, Wisconsin, USA
*******************************
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
List info at http://www.vwtype3.org/list | mailto:gregm@vwtype3.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~