[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]
Jason, Um, I guess someone should have told the previous owner that the car would someday end up in the hands of a new owner and be placed in the Type3 forum of public view and opinion. Maybe then she would have taken more time as to preserve the interior to show, unrealistic standards. The reason the vehicle was recently "re-sprayed" is because the previous owner had a slight fender-bender, which I was informed of, that frightened her from ever driving again. As far as the interior goes -- there are no grease marks as the pictures may elude too. In my opinion the only things that could be in better shape are the carpet and headliner. Other than that the interior, although a bit dusty, shows very little wear as does the dash, gauges, rubbers, etc. There is nothing in the interior of this vehicle that a good detailing will not fix Rhonda ----- Original Message ----- From: <jason.smith@sarcom.com> To: <type3@vwtype3.org> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 3:38 AM Subject: RE: [T3] New 1967 Square > > > Attached for you are pictures of my 1967 as it was > > advertised on the > > > Old Bug website. Enjoy. > > > > > > http://www.oldbug.com/rexsquare.htm > > > > Really, REALLY nice! ;-) > > > > > I don't understand how a car that looks this nice on the outside, looks so > horrible on the inside? I know it was repainted but it just seems odd to > me, something does not sit right with the look and the story. The image of > a nice old lady driving with this interior. What's with all the greasy hand > prints all over the headliner and visors, she must have been pretty handy? > But I guess she might have had a husband at some point. > > But Nice even without the story. > > > Jason Smith > 71 Square FI AT > Columbus, OH USA > http://jasontsmith.tripod.com/vw.htm > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > List info at http://www.vwtype3.org/list | mailto:gregm@vwtype3.org >