[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]

Re: [T3] Response2: Carb Conversion


On 27 Feb 2001, at 9:45, Douglas_Brashear@amsinc.com wrote:

> Exhausting all my own ideas, I took the car to a local shop...although
> I thought the engine and all related bits were absolutely the original
> for the car, they said that after looking up the serial number on the
> ECU and distributor, that the correct timing is not what is shown on
> the timing sticker.  I'm planning on re-looking up those numbers so I
> know the correct timing setting for myself.

They're right that the tune-up specs must be done according to 
what the engine is, not what year the body was made. Post the 
engine #, ECU # dist #, etc, and we can try to verify what year you 
should be treating this as. A 73 is much easier to set up than a 72.

> I had a Bentley, but for some strange reason I must've sold it with my
> old 69 Square.  Jim, if you have spare old copies of both books I'd be
> happy to take them off your hands :-)  Name your price.

I'll send you that info when I get home tonight.

> I have a timing light and would consider myself rather skilled at
> setting timing.  My vacuum advance unit is somewhat new and holds
> vacuum well.  The advance unit seems to do what it's supposed to
> (checked using my timing light) but I'm not sure how to measure that
> it's making it to the necessary max advance.  Probably in Bentley? 
> Now that I think about it, the car seems a bit rougher at speed,
> possibly suggesting that the advance curve isn't what the car is
> expecting, or it's not reaching the max advance...I'll check the part
> number on the vac unit to be sure it's the correct one.

73 should use a 505 vacuum can.

> As for the injectors, visual inspection reveals that no fuel is
> leaking from the hoses or injectors.  The fuel lines are all new and I
> removed the crimp-on clamps securing the small segment of hose to the
> injectors in favor of double hose clamps and 90 PSI hose segments. 
> When I thought they might be leaking, I thought maybe they're dripping
> into the manifold, to the point that the engine can't fully regulate
> the fuel intake...the injectors drip into the manifold (not making a
> good seal when closed), the ECU senses the additional fuel and cuts
> off the supply, the car almost stalls, the ECU adds more fuel, the
> leak occurs again...hence, my slight surging problem?

The ECU has no way to measure extra fuel drips; it can only sense 
temp, manifold vacuum, and RPM. It is more likely that your idle is 
just set a bit high and this makes the engine lope when it senses 
an idle speed that is too high. This produces a VERY pronounced 
lope, but if your symptom is more subtle, there is probably a 
different reason. There are several possibilities, but you need to 
check all the standard tune-up items first.

Another thing to check is the charging system regulating voltage. 
With the engine warmed up after a drive, measure the battery 
voltage with the engine running at medium RPM. The voltage 
should be >14V (14.1-14.4V.) If it is less than 14 the voltage 
regulator is worn; if it is less than 13.5 you should replace the VR.

-
Jim Adney
jadney@vwtype3.org
Madison, WI 53711-3054
USA

-------------------------------------------------------------------
List info at http://www.vwtype3.org/list or mailto:help@vwtype3.org


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]