[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]
-----Original Message----- From: Greg Merritt [mailto:gregm@vwtype3.org] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:54 PM To: Type3 Subject: Re: [T3] Bentley On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Per Lindgren wrote: > > been hearing everyone tout the Bentley and thought I might be lacking! > > I'm not sure what you might be lacking. I have never had the Bentley, but have See: http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=lacking ...way at the bottom, there's the definition "deficient in common sense" -- as in, "I thought I was missing something -- why would a '68+ manual be relevant to my '64 automobile?" I think that the orange Elfrink book is pretty neat, and covers the older cars. It's out of print, though. -Greg ------------------------------------------------------------------- Nice way to think of list members who have not seen a Bentley and may not have realized that it was for only '68-'73. They may have missed an email or 2 that said that. I know I don't read all the posts. I may read even less now. I have been meaning to say something the last couple of times you (Greg) have come back with a smart-a$$ answer, but have held back. If you are only joking, that's different, but you don't specify and we all know that "intent" can't be discerned from email. --- Justin http://edenfieldjd.tripod.com '95 CBR9 FeRRari red masquerading as a '93 '84 XR200R RFVC '71 Type 3 Squareback