[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]

RE: Secondary oil cooler


Yo, Jaime, check out my statistics page on my Squareback then you'll know
why
I'm doing this, otherwise I totally agree with you  :)  <chime, new mail>
Yes,
Doug is correct in that message he just posted.

As for Doug, duhh, I didn't even think about the bumper!  That would be a
good
idea though the bumper would get hot and providing air into it wouldn't be
that
difficult or an eye-sore.  You are correct, though, I don't have my bumpers
on
and they won't be going on since I've had the fender dimples smoothed over.

Thanks for the input!
   Toby Erkson
   air_cooled_nut@pobox.com  <-- Please use this address for email
   '72 VW Squareback 1.6L bored and stroked to 2.0L, Berg five-speed
   '75 Porsche 914 1.8L, ORPCA member
   Portland, Oregon, http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/8501/

>-----Original Message-----
>>>This thread is addictive...what about making a long coil ala Porsche,
>and
>> having it inside the rear bumper with some sort of a small (but long)
>> air
>> scoop to bring air in there...but then again, now that I think
>> about
>> it I don't remember seeing bumpers on your car (saw the pics in your
>> website)...<<
>>
>If type 3's were designed with the same performance parameters as that
>of a Porsche, then the VW engineers would have designed a complimentary
>cooling system that worked within those parameters.  With a 
>vehicle that
>produces at best 1/3 bhp as that  of a Porsche 911, as an example,  the
>cooling system VW engineers designed is more than adequate.  Why would
>anyone think they can do it better; and, moreover, PROVE IT with any
>sort of empirical data??
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------
List info at http://www.vwtype3.org/list or mailto:help@vwtype3.org


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]