[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]
Just a thought, but 92's are just too big for decent cooling on a type3. I've heard this way too many times too ignore. The bigger pistons have so much surface area on the barrels that the fan and cooling tin on an otherwise stock motor will be insufficient to cool the motor to within suggestable parameters. If you want displacement, go with a stroker crank if you can afford it, and try to stick to 88 pistons. This was professed to me straight from the Berg's mouths so I trust it. Kenik Hassel 71 fastback (78crank X 88piston motor=1897cc) On Tue, 23 Sep 1997, T o M wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > At 10:31 AM 9/23/97 PDT, Mista Erkson wrote: > >Need more detail on your motor. Stock or what? I always wanted a > more > >powerful engine so I went 2.0L, that's my recommendation, but only > if you > >have the money and time to maintain it (it takes more than FI). > > So then, Toby, what are your feelings about going w/a 1835? Would > that be all the trouble and expense of a 2L w/o the extra power? > > T o M > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 > Charset: noconv > > iQA/AwUBNCgBoV4FCirt/GJmEQLwIACg14QYdKtIYyCmSGmnIQCazoGYKTsAoNFu > sLTS35QIfgSWctX71AyC0Byc > =hwc5 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > *¥Ø`….½½.…¥Ø`….½½.…¥Ø`…¥Ø`….½½.…¥Ø`….½½.…¥Ø`* > * http://www.wolfenet.com/~peaceman * > * ICQ# 3252482 * > *¥Ø`….½½.…¥Ø`….½½.…¥Ø`…¥Ø`….½½.…¥Ø`….½½.…¥Ø`* > >