[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]
Wilson, OK lets start the flame war.8*) Carbs VS FI. I will offer my opinions. I don't think that working on FI is too complicated. You need to have patience, multimeter and a Bentleys Book. If you want Hi-perf you have many more options and lower costs with Carbs. If you want a fuel efficient and slightly more powerful stock motor then FI is the way to go. I personally think it is easier to tune a FI car. You don't have to sync the carbs. I think everyone will agree that the single progressive carb is something to stay away from in a Type 3. I vote for "go with what you are comfortable with" if you aren't willing to learn how to work on FI and you already know how to tune carbs then stick with them. If you don't know much about tuning carbs and you are willing to learn about FI the stick with them. And don't listen to anyone that tells you parts are too hard to find for FI. So many people are busy ripping out good FI systems that good used parts are a dime a dozen. Jason Renville ______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________ >I've been questioning if FI is better than carbs for some time now. I > lots of problems have arised from time to time that I can't fix because of >the complexity and number of parts to the FI. >Any other experiences and opinions would greatly be appreciated. >thanks - Wilson