Re: lowering...in response to mgkepner's serman

["vernon chand" <vychand@ihug.co.nz>]

hey guys!!

i think everyone should chill out.i have a lowered car and jims comments
certainly didnt offend me.after all he wasnt aiming his opinion at anyone
personally.

'tis the festive season and a time to be merry...glug..glug..glug...burp..

any takers?

regards
vern

----------
> From: Craig Marshburn <mrphott@corpnettech.com>
> To: type-3@umich.edu
> Subject: Re: lowering...in response to mgkepner's serman
> Date: Monday, 15 December 1997 06:12
> 
> > So is Jim's opinion to be banned from this list? When it comes to
> lowering i
> > feel
> > just as strong about it as Jim does.  It's a personal opinion which we
> should be
> > able to express on this list. If somebody, because of a different
opinion
> feels
> > offended: Grow up! 
> > 
> > Richard Visser
> > '67 as stock as possible SB 
> His opinion should not be banned but could have been expressed
> intelligently by giving reasons not to lower a vehicle.  Ranting to no
end
> gives no one a better feel.  You also have to take into consideration
that
> if an owner wants to lower his car for whatever reason he can because it
is
> his vehicle and not yours.  I have a lowered, by PO, 73 Manual and also a
> 71 Auto that is not lowered.  The 73 does have it's advantages in
handling.
>  The 71 also has it's adavantages in being stock height.  I enjoy both
and
> think you should be a little more open minded to others wants.  Just keep
> in mind that it is not your car and that you are not the Type III ruler
> passing down judgement on others as they try to restore something that
> would otherwise be rust on someone's lawn.
> 
> -Craig
> -71 Auto
> -73 Manual