[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]
On 14 Feb 2004 at 0:17, Dave Hall wrote: > Was he suggesting a 110V kerosene space heater to replace the petrol combustion > section rather than an electrical heater? I wouldn't have thought using a > different fuel would have reduced the risk much, particularly as it would be a > lash up rather than an engineered and tested piece of equipment with safety > provisions. I was assuming he was suggesting a purely electrical heater, but that might have been incorrect. I agree that even though kerosene is a LOT less dangerous than gasoline, the lack of a well thought out product in this application would be a problem. Carbon monoxide for one thing. -- ******************************* Jim Adney, jadney@vwtype3.org Madison, Wisconsin, USA ******************************* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ List info at http://www.vwtype3.org/list | mailto:gregm@vwtype3.org