[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]
> >I think ALL of these dists are combination vacuum/mech advance, > > The dizzy that was in there was just vacuum. The replacement is vacuum (two connections on advance can) and mechanical. I've done the 'suck test' on the vac advance can - OK. The vac retard side (larger bore) will not pass the suck test - it's leaky. The mech advance seems to work fine; smooth advance as the revs are increased. > Isn't the double vac dizzy a '72 part? (not that it makes a difference!) ------------------------------------------------------------------- Too much? Digest! mailto:type3-d-request@vwtype3.org Subj=subscribe