[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]

RE: [T3] Bentley

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Merritt [mailto:gregm@vwtype3.org]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:54 PM
To: Type3
Subject: Re: [T3] Bentley

On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Per Lindgren wrote:

> > been hearing everyone tout the Bentley and thought I might be lacking!
> I'm not sure what you might be lacking. I have never had the Bentley, but

	See: http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=lacking ...way
at the bottom, there's the definition "deficient in common sense" -- as
in, "I thought I was missing something -- why would a '68+ manual be
relevant to my '64 automobile?"

	I think that the orange Elfrink book is pretty neat, and covers
the older cars.  It's out of print, though.



Nice way to think of list members who have not seen a Bentley and may not
have realized that it was for only '68-'73.  They may have missed an email
or 2 that said that.  I know I don't read all the posts.  I may read even
less now.  I have been meaning to say something the last couple of times you
(Greg) have come back with a smart-a$$ answer, but have held back.  If you
are only joking, that's different, but you don't specify and we all know
that "intent" can't be discerned from email.

'95 CBR9 FeRRari red masquerading as a '93
'84 XR200R RFVC
'71 Type 3 Squareback 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]