[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [New Search]
True, true. Just echoing what I read in the Berg catalog. Or (knowing my memory) that's what he said and I flopped it. Anyway, a volumetric drop still would not be good, correct? Toby Erkson, air_cooled_nut@pobox.com '72 VW Squareback 1.6L bored and stroked to 2.0L '75 Porsche 914 1.8L Portland, Oregon, http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/8501/ P.S. Please volks, there's no need to copy me if you're going to be sending your comment to the Type III mailing list as well. I understand what you were saying the first time! :) ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: Re[4]: New engine coming Author: type-3-errors@umich.edu at SMTPGATE Date: 10/8/97 7:31 PM > >Now, part of his philosophy dictates that an external oil cooler shouldn't >be needed on an engine and one of the reasons, though minor, is that many >oil coolers are a restriction and they are what cause the drop in oil >pressure. Actually resistrictions to flow increase pressure, thet decrease volume. Try putting a type4 cooler on a type one, there is a 45 degree change, but a pressure drop of 30 lbs at high rpms. This can be solved with a pressure adjuster put in the oil control hole. Jasper-Flat Four Racing ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com